Researcher Dr. Ralph Wilde has recently unveiled a legal analysis shedding light on the responsibilities of third states in light of Israel’s potential breaches of the Genocide Convention

Titled “Legal Consequences for third States of Israel’s potential breaches of the Genocide Convention in the light of the ICJ’s Provisional Measures Orders in the South Africa v Israel case,” the legal opinion was published by the Arab Organisation for Human Rights in the United Kingdom.

The study examines the legal obligations incumbent upon “third States,” defined as all states except Israel and South Africa in this context, in response to Israel’s potential violations of international law pertaining to genocide. Dr. Wilde emphasizes that these obligations arise not solely from joint responsibility with Israel but from the broader framework of rights and obligations conferred upon all states in light of Israel’s transgressions.

It is crucial to note that the focus of the study is exclusively on the legal consequences for third states arising from Israel’s violations, irrespective of whether they share joint responsibility with Israel. However, it does not explore the consequences stemming from violations of international law by other states or joint responsibility scenarios.

This legal study emphasize the imperative for all states to uphold their obligations in the face of potential violations, irrespective of their direct involvement.

Moreover, the opinion asserts that Israel’s use of force in Gaza must cease immediately to address the alleged violations of the Genocide Convention. Wilde discusses avenues through which states can support the ongoing International Court of Justice case initiated by South Africa against Israel, including active participation in the proceedings. Additionally, Wilde suggests providing financial assistance to The International Criminal Court for its investigation into the situation in Palestine.

For further information and to read the legal opinion, click here